Discobolos, Ancient Greek Statue
http://www.ancientgreece.com/s/Sculpture/
This sculpture is said to be one of the best sculptures that illustrates the freedom of movement. This sculpture is by Myron in the Museo Nazionale Romano, Rome. This sculpture is one of the most famous sculptures of Rome, and I was first introduced to this sculpture in the sixth grade. This sculpture was very important to Grecian art and culture: "The classical age also saw the first time human anatomy was deemed worthy of being portrayed in a statue and forever immortalized in stone and bronze." This sculpture seemed to have changed the life of Grecian sculptures. As discussed in the article, portraying people in a static and stiff position had not been replaced with the more modern 'snap-shot' three-dimensional movements, so that people could admire the human body for its aesthetic values; this claim from the article is very interesting to me because that is how I defined Roman architecture. I defined Roman architecture as an architecture that loved portraying the human species as a dominant and conquering species. The article describes the evolution of Roman architecture and its meaning. It is said in the article that this sculpture was the first time that humans could be seen as almost God-like, meaning that the human body became the subject of study at this time. The following is quoted from the article and it ultimately describes the evolution of Roman architecture:
"In ancient Greece, a long intellectual evolution had reached its logical conclusion during the classical era when 'men as a living organism on this planet acquired the importance it deserved and gods became human through marble and bronze'."
The influence of democracy and different philosophies changed the dynamics of art tremendously. It is said in the article that from the Classical period, all the Greek statues from this time period displayed a lack of expression, whereas, the depiction of 'barbarians' show a dramatic facial expression. This was because the Greeks believed that suppression of the emotions was a noble characteristic of all civilized men, while the public display of human emotion was a sign of barbarism. It is also said that logic and reason was to dominate human expression even during the most dramatic situations. I firmly agree with the proclamations of the article because it distinctively describes the evolution of Roman architecture while simultaneously showing the effects the evolved art had on society.